Assume I don't know what I'm talking about. I'm a bit of a hardware noob, so I'll take whatever guidance I can get.
#QUADRO K5200 UPGRADE#
These cards have been out since Q2 2014, so would it be best to assume they will never provide support for them? I notice that they are supported by Max 2015, and I could upgrade as long as my plugins would all work with it.
So apparently the K5200/K4200 aren't even supported in Max 2014 then.
#QUADRO K5200 DRIVER#
So I did a search of driver support on the Autodesk site and found this. Don't know why, but development seems to have got worse when it comes to drivers."
#QUADRO K5200 DRIVERS#
(This is not benchmarked in Max, but I'm assuming a lot of crossover.) One thing that worries me is the very last comment in that above link: "I have quadro k2200 and it's not better than my old firepro v4800 which was way much cheaper, also Nvidia doesn't list it on the certified drivers and new driver updates for 3dsmax.
(Also, I'm a heavy Photoshop user which I also want the Quadro for.)īut the question is, how much better is the K5200 for things like viewport performance and real time updating? Has anyone had scenes that the 5200 could handle well that the 4200 couldn't, or general experiences that would indicate this? I know that the Quadro line is what I want since it seems tailored to play nice with Max using iRay. I never render animations, and my still images tend to be about 5000 pixels on the longest side.) Note: I tend to render a lot of reflective objects and glass, meaning I want great raytracing performance. (I use Mental Ray but am thinking of switching to Vray soon, if that makes any difference. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB GDDR5 Dual Slot Graphics Card - Refurbished at the best online prices at eBay Free shipping for many products Skip to main content. Smooth viewport performance for complex scenesįast real time lighting in viewports, like having "realistic" mode on without the problem of flickering or super inaccurate shadows.įaster render times. Things that are important to me (most important first): Obviously the 5200 is better, but how much better? Better enough to justify paying 800 dollars more? I know this is a somewhat subjective question, but I can afford it or I wouldn't be asking for help in deciding between the two. All the experiments were conducted using Google's TensorFlow with Quadro K5200 GPU.
In my old machine I'm getting a lot of bounding boxes in my viewports, viewport lag, and a distracting kind of flickering when in "realistic" mode.įor the new build, I can't decide between the Quadro K5200 or K4200. from four single- imagery NNs models (Bruzzone et al., 1999). I'm talking hundreds/thousands of objects in a scene.
#QUADRO K5200 PC#
Whether you’re developing revolutionary products or telling spectacularly vivid visual stories, Quadro gives you the performance to do it brilliantly.I'm building a PC and gearing towards building very high poly, multi-object, all-around complex scenes in Max (2014). Quadro cards are certified with a broad range of sophisticated professional applications, tested by leading workstation manufacturers, and backed by a global team of support specialists, giving you the peace of mind to focus on doing your best work. Accelerate data transfer with external I/O boards through GPUDirect™ for Video and dual-copy engines. Synchronize multiple displays across systems with the Quadro Sync board. Plus, there’s the all-new display engine that drives up to four displays natively with DisplayPort 1.2 support for ultra-high resolutions like 4096 x 2160 60 Hz with 30-bit color. 8 GB of GDDR5 GPU memory with ultra-fast bandwidth allows you to create and render large, complex models and compute massive datasets. The NVIDIA Quadro K5200 gives you amazing application performance and capability, making it faster and easier to accelerate 3D models, render complex scenes, and simulate large datasets.
0 kommentar(er)
